Platform Overview
The RFD platform is a single-propeller thrust-vector-controlled (TVC) tail-sitter. Unlike quadrotor-VTOL aircraft (e.g. Carbonix Volanti, DeltaQuad, Quantum Trinity), which carry dedicated lift rotors that are dead weight in cruise, the tail-sitter uses the same propulsion system for both hover and forward flight. The aircraft takes off and lands on its tail with the nose pointing vertically; forward flight is achieved by pitching the whole airframe over ~90° about the lateral axis until the wing is horizontal and generating lift.
Architecture — how the aircraft is built
Section titled “Architecture — how the aircraft is built”Common to the family:
- Ø120 mm bayonet fuselage in stacked sections (nose → payload bay → battery bay → avionics → propulsion) — packs into a transport tube.
- Removable fixed wing for cruise; stows alongside the fuselage for transport.
- Propulsion & Control Unit (PCU) — the fixed rear assembly: motor, ESC, propeller, four servos, TVC vanes, and an X-tail of swept fins. The X-tail fins double as the landing gear.
- Control by thrust-vectoring: vanes in the propeller slipstream steer the thrust to produce pitch, roll and yaw moments in hover, complemented by the aerodynamic surfaces in cruise.
- PX4 flight stack on a Cube-class autopilot; RFD QGroundControl-based ground station.
Aircraft identity & markings
Section titled “Aircraft identity & markings”- Serial number: on an adhesive label at the battery power connector (receiving side) — in
front of the operator every time a battery is plugged in. Quote it in all support and warranty
correspondence. Format:
<model>-<variant>-<sequence>, e.g.EP250-A-0001. - Model identifier: printed into the airframe skin.
- CG and orientation fiducials: the CG symbol with fore/aft limit arrows, and the circular “this-way-up” alignment fiducials, are printed into the skin (see Part B weight & balance and assembly).
- Registration: mark and register the aircraft per your CASA obligations; RFD aircraft to date carry CASA-issued registration numbers.
The two family members differ in how thrust is produced:
- EP250 — a ducted, contra-rotating coaxial propulsor. The duct shrouds the prop (safety, compactness) and the contra-rotating pair cancels reaction torque.
- EP450 — a single open propeller, ductless, with the reaction torque handled in closed loop by the TVC vanes/fins. This removes the duct (FTO-clean) at the cost of a slightly larger disc.
See Part B for the per-aircraft anatomy and specifications.
Why tail-sitter
Section titled “Why tail-sitter”- Tube-launchable. The slender, near-axisymmetric stowed form fits inside a transport/launch tube.
- No dead weight. Every gram of propulsion contributes to both hover and cruise, enabling high cruise/dash performance at low gross weight.
- Mechanical simplicity. No tilt mechanisms, no separate lift rotors, no transition-geometry servos.
What pilots transitioning from other platforms must know
Section titled “What pilots transitioning from other platforms must know”- The aircraft pitches its entire body to transition. There is no separate “lift” and “cruise” propulsion. Loss of thrust = loss of both lift and control authority at once.
- In hover the nose points up. Orientation cues that work for a quadrotor (looking down on the platform) do not apply — you are looking at the underside of the aircraft in hover.
- Transition is an energetic, autopilot-managed manoeuvre. Manual transition is for emergency recovery only. The forward transition is tuned to be near-flat; the back transition trades cruise speed for a modest altitude gain (a “balloon”) as the aircraft pitches up — plan clearance for it.
- Hover yaw authority is lower than cruise. Yaw in hover comes from the TVC vanes/fins in the slipstream (and, on the EP250, the contra-pair); plan hover manoeuvres accordingly. On the single-motor EP450 this is the weak axis — take off already aligned with the intended outbound bearing (it cannot slew a large heading quickly in hover).
- Wind affects hover more than a multirotor of similar mass, because the wing presents a large side-on area to crosswinds. Hover wind limits are correspondingly tighter — see each aircraft’s data.
Comparison to quadrotor VTOL (e.g. Volanti/DeltaQuad class)
Section titled “Comparison to quadrotor VTOL (e.g. Volanti/DeltaQuad class)”| Aspect | Quadrotor VTOL | RFD tail-sitter |
|---|---|---|
| Take-off attitude | Wings horizontal, lift rotors vertical | Wings vertical, nose pointing up |
| Lift in hover | Dedicated VTOL rotors | Main propulsion thrust |
| Transition | Gradual, lift rotors assist | Rapid pitch-over, wing lift develops |
| Cruise efficiency | Lift rotors are dead weight | All propulsion is productive |
| Hover wind tolerance | Higher (compact footprint) | Lower (wing presents side area) |
| Stowed form factor | Large case, wings detached | Slender tube, fully integrated |
| Failure of one lift source | Degrades to remaining rotors | Total (single thrust path) — manage battery/thrust margin |